1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 637 A.2d
  5. 637 A.2d 441 (1994)
 

DEVINE v. ROCHE BIOMEDICAL LAB.

Decision No. 6754.

637 A.2d 441 (1994)

Thomas DEVINE v. ROCHE BIOMEDICAL LABORATORIES, INC., et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided January 14, 1994.

As Amended March 14, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terrence D. Garmey (orally), Roberts H. Furbish (orally), Smith & Elliott, Portland, for plaintiff.

Arlyn H. Weeks (orally), Constance P. O'Neil, Conley, Haley & O'Neil, Bath, Gerald Petruccelli (orally), James B. Haddow, Petruccelli & Martin, Portland, Malcolm L. Lyons (orally), Benjamin P. Townsend, Pierce, Atwood, Scribner, Allen, Smith & Lancaster, Augusta, for defendants.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, COLLINS, RUDMAN and DANA, JJ.

RUDMAN, Justice.

Plaintiff Thomas Devine and Defendant Bath Iron Works Corporation (BIW) appeal from summary judgments entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Fritzsche, J.) in favor of Defendants Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc. and Northern Diagnostic Laboratories, Inc. (NorDx) (collectively "the labs"). Based upon the record before us, there are no material issues of fact as to Devine's tort claims against the labs. We therefore affirm the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases