In light of the fact that plaintiff failed to adequately establish that it would be impracticable for her to again attempt to serve Walsh pursuant to CPLR 308 (2), there were no grounds for the court to direct expedient service upon defendant's counsel pursuant to CPLR 308 (5) (see, Simens v Sedrish,
Nor is there any merit to plaintiff's challenge to the Judicial Hearing Officer's well-founded determination...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.