Defendant was not denied his constitutional right of counsel by the court's order limiting his telephone privileges to calling his attorney, only. There is no evidence that the granting of the order detrimentally affected the manner in which counsel represented defendant. In any event, defense counsel was advised of the order and appeared before the court to be heard on the matter. Further, there is no indication that defendant's segregation caused him to receive inadequate...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.