1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 995 F.2d
  5. 995 F.2d 646 (1993)
 

BURGESS v. ELI LILLY & CO.

No. 91-3718.

995 F.2d 646 (1993)

Sanda BURGESS, Lillian Baker, and Deborah D. Sauer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided June 7, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sam G. Caras (argued and briefed), Gianuglou, Dankof, Caras & Hruska, Dayton, OH, for plaintiffs-appellants.

James E. Pohlman, Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Columbus, OH, Thomas H. Pyper, Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Dayton, OH, Andrew See (argued and briefed), Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Michelle R. Mangrum, Laura D. Stith, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Kansas City, MO, for defendant-appellee.

Before: JONES and MILBURN, Circuit Judges; and WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judge.

MILBURN, Circuit Judge.

Sanda Burgess, Lillian Baker, and Deborah D. Sauer appeal the district court's decision to grant summary judgment in favor of Eli Lilly on statute of limitations grounds. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.

I.

Plaintiffs Sanda Burgess, Lillian Baker, and Deborah D. Sauer filed this personal injury action against defendant Eli Lilly and Company seeking damages for injuries allegedly resulting from exposure to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases