KLEINMAN v. WIDER


197 A.D.2d 892 (1993)

604 N.Y.S.2d 857

Aaron B. Kleinman, Respondent, v. Edward Wider, Respondent, and Dorothy Namulik et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Edward Wider, Respondent, v. Dorothy Namulik et al., Appellants. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

October 1, 1993


Order unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum:

Inasmuch as the depositions of the parties have not yet been taken, Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendants Namuliks' cross motion for summary judgment without prejudice to renew at the close of discovery (see, CPLR 3212 [f]). Further, we conclude that the court properly exercised its discretion in permitting plaintiff Wider...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases