Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
Supreme Court properly dismissed the CPLR article 78 petition challenging respondent's denial of petitioner's application for an area variance. To be entitled to an area variance, petitioner had the burden of establishing that strict application of the zoning ordinance would result in practical difficulties (see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.