MOLL v. ABBOTT LAB.

Docket Nos. 115542, 115550.

192 Mich. App. 724 (1992)

482 N.W.2d 197

MOLL v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided February 3, 1992, at 9:25 A.M.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barr & Arsenault (by Charles J. Barr and Bodo Schimers), for the plaintiffs.

Schureman, Frakes, Glass & Wulfmeier (by Cheryl Chandler), for Abbott Laboratories.

Plunkett & Cooney, P.C. (by B.I. Stanczyk, Robert G. Kamenec, and William J. Lynch) (Dickson, Carlson & Campillo by William A. Hanssen, Robert M. Dato, and Nancy Lucas Haniotis, of Counsel), for E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.

Dickinson, Wright, Moon, Van Dusen & Freeman (by Richard A. Glaser, Kathleen A. Lang, and Mary Beth Kelly) and Shook, Hardy & Bacon (by Laurel J. Harbour and Michelle Mangrum), for Eli Lilly and Company.

Reynold, Beeby & Magnuson (by Ronald C. Paul), for Carroll Chemical Company.

Martin, Bacon & Martin (by James N. Martin), for Cooper Laboratories, Inc.

Barbier & Tolleson, P.C. (by Peggy King Scully), for Halsey Drug.

Johnson, Shefferly, McCarroll & Moesta (by Reginald S. Johnson), for Central Pharmaceuticals.

Dykema, Gossett, Spencer, Goodnow & Trigg (by Susan Artinian and Bonnie Mayfield), for Baxter Healthcare Corp.

Vandeveer, Garzia, Tonkin, Kerr, Heaphy, Moore, Sills & Poling (by Edmund M. Brady, Jr.), for Blueline Chemical Co. and William H. Rorer Co.

Butzel, Long, Gust, Klein & Van Zile (by Xhafer Orhan and Lynn M. Sheehy), for Chromally Pharmaceutical.

Parmenter, Forsythe, Rude, Van Epps, Briggs & Fauri (by Eric J. Fauri), for Altana, Inc.

Estes & Schweickert (by John C. Schweickert), for Consolidated Midland Corporation.

Nystrom, Nystrom & Hitchcock (by Steven J. Hitchcock), for Burroughs-Wellcome Corporation.

Buesser, Buesser, Blank, Fryhoff & Graham (by William O. Lynch), for Haack Laboratories.

Before: REILLY, P.J., and SHEPHERD and MARILYN KELLY, JJ.


REILLY, P.J.

Defendants Eli Lilly & Company, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., and others separately appeal by leave granted from a circuit court order denying their motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7). Their appeals have been consolidated, and we affirm.

In this pharmaceutical products liability action, plaintiff Jean Moll alleges that as a result of her in utero exposure to the prescription drug diethylstilbestrol (DES) she suffers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases