Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued February 19, 1992.
Decided March 31, 1992.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Kenneth A. Cohen, Marshall Simonds, Robert W. Keller, Jay P. Mayesh and David M. Covey for Eli Lilly and Company and another, appellants.
Charles J. Walsh, Stuart M. Feinblatt, Theodore V. H. Mayer, Carl H. Sword, Jr., Paul K. Stecker, Tamar P. Halpern, Leslie A. McHugh and Karl E. Seib, Jr., for E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., and others, appellants.
William D. Fireman and Stuart A. Schlesinger for respondents.
Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur; Judge BELLACOSA taking no part.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Chief Judge WACHTLER.
In Hymowitz v Lilly & Co. (73 N.Y.2d 487, 507), this Court, recognizing that "extant common-law doctrines, unmodified, provide no relief for the DES plaintiff unable to identify the manufacturer of the drug that injured her," adopted a market share theory to create a "realistic avenue of relief for plaintiffs injured by DES." Since our decision...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.