1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 800 F.Supp.
  5. 800 F.Supp. 567 (1992)
 

STOTT v. BUNGE CORP.

No. CIV 1-92-0028.

800 F.Supp. 567 (1992)

Jimmie Louise STOTT, Plaintiff, v. BUNGE CORPORATION and Beatrice Company, as the successor to Esmark, Inc. Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga.

August 7, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O. Michael Carter, Lusk, Carter & McGhehey, Chattanooga, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Richard J. McAfee, Heiskell, Donelson, Bearman, Adams, Williams & Kirsch, Chattanooga, Tenn., for Bunge Corp.

William G. Colvin, Shumacker & Thompson, Chattanooga, Tenn., Beatrice Co.

CORRECTED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JORDAN, District Judge.

This civil action is before the Court for consideration of the report and recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Robert P. Murrian on June 8, 1992 [doc. 14]. No party has filed an objection to this report and recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the report and recommendation to treat any objections to it as having been waived. The Court, upon a de novo

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases