DEVINS v. BOROUGH OF BOGOTA


124 N.J. 570 (1991)

592 A.2d 199

JAMES J. DEVINS AND MARY J. DEVINS, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOROUGH OF BOGOTA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 10, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen M. Bell argued the cause for appellants (Jacobs, Bell & Baumol, attorneys; Doreen E. McManimon, on the brief).

Joseph G. Monaghan argued the cause for respondent (DeMarrais & Monaghan, attorneys).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.

The primary issue on this appeal is whether adverse possession should apply to municipally-owned property not dedicated to or used for a public purpose. Ruling that adverse possession should not so apply, the Appellate Division affirmed the Chancery Division's grant of summary judgment for the municipality, Borough of Bogota ("the Borough" or "Bogota").

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases