1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 234 Cal.App.3d
  5. 234 Cal.App.3d 963 (1991)
 

HAIGHT, BROWN & BONESTEEL v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B057441.

234 Cal.App.3d 963 (1991)

285 Cal. Rptr. 845

HAIGHT, BROWN & BONESTEEL, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; WILLIAM B. FITZGERALD et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

September 27, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Howarth & Smith, Don Howarth and Barbara Gregg Glenn for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Buchalter, Nemer, Fields & Younger, Howard P. Miller, and Wanda R. Dorgan for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

FUKUTO, J.

Petitioner, Haight, Brown & Bonesteel (HBB), seeks a writ of mandate after the trial court granted a motion for judgment on the pleadings in favor of real parties in interest (DCC partners).1

Haight, Dickson, Brown & Bonesteel was a law partnership with its principal office in Santa Monica, California, and a branch office...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases