COUNTY OF LOS ALAMOS v. TAPIA

No. 18304.

790 P.2d 1017 (1990)

COUNTY OF LOS ALAMOS, Petitioner, v. Joe D. TAPIA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

April 12, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Byron L. Treaster, Los Alamos, for petitioner.

Griffith, Boone & Cruse, P. Reid Griffith, Jr., Los Alamos, for respondent.


OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Justice.

In the trial of a criminal case, after jeopardy attaches,1 one of three outcomes is possible: The trial may be completed and the defendant acquitted; the trial may be completed and the defendant convicted; or the trial may not be completed at all, in which case it will have been aborted by some ruling of the trial court. In the first situation, it has been settled for almost a century that the Double...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases