STATE v. DIXON89-00823-C; CA A60810.

784 P.2d 134 (1989)
100 Or.App. 60

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Joel Daniel DIXON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted November 29, 1989.
Decided December 28, 1989.
Henry M. Silberblatt, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Acting Public Defender, Salem.
Ann Kelley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal and in not specifying in the sentencing order the amount of restitution and court-appointed attorney fees that he is required to pay as a condition of suspending imposition of sentence.

The evidence was sufficient to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, his conviction is affirmed.

The state concedes that defendant is correct in stating that the court erred in not specifying the amount of restitution and attorney fees that he is required to pay. Accordingly, we remand for resentencing.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in the Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which the Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases