STATE v. DIXON 89-00823-C; CA A60810.
784 P.2d 134 (1989)
100 Or.App. 60
STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Joel Daniel DIXON, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Decided December 28, 1989.
Ann Kelley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.
Defendant appeals his conviction for assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal and in not specifying in the sentencing order the amount of restitution and court-appointed attorney fees that he is required to pay as a condition of suspending imposition of sentence.
The evidence was sufficient to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, his conviction is affirmed.
Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
- No Cases Found