1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Kan.
  4. 245 Kan.
  5. 245 Kan. 290 (1989)
 

ROGERS v. WILLIAMS, LARSON, VOSS, STROBEL & ESTES

No. 63,035

245 Kan. 290 (1989)

777 P.2d 836

BEVERLY F. ROGERS and WILLIAM N. ROGERS (Individuals, and as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Charles Merkle, Deceased), Appellants, v. WILLIAMS, LARSON, VOSS, STROBEL & ESTES, A partnership of James A. Williams, Byron G. Larson, George Voss, Ken William Strobel, and Max Eugene Estes, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed July 14, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard Fick, of Manhattan, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellants.

F. James Robinson, Jr., of Kahrs, Nelson, Fanning, Hite & Kellogg, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Richard L. Honeyman, of the same firm, was with him on the brief for appellees.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFARLAND, J.:

This is a legal malpractice action in which the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant attorneys on the basis of res judicata and the running of the statute of limitations. Plaintiffs Beverly F. Rogers and William N. Rogers, as individuals and co-administrators of the estate of Charles Merkle, deceased, appeal therefrom.

The facts, although uncontroverted, must be set forth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases