FIGURED v. PARALEGAL TECH. SERV.


231 N.J. Super. 251 (1989)

555 A.2d 663

BARBARA FIGURED, WILLIAM FIGURED AND JASON FIGURED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS, v. PARALEGAL TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., RONAL F. AUSTIN AND RONALD E. FREEMAS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 23, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Yablonsky argued the cause for appellants (Courter, Kobert, Laufer, Purcell and Pease, attorneys, Robert A. Smith on the brief).

Richard D. Millet argued the cause for respondents (Hampson & Millet, attorneys, Richard D. Millet and Kathleen Suleiman, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, SCALERA and STERN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by STERN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff commenced this action against two investigators and the corporation which employed them.1 The complaint alleged, among other things, that defendants' surveillance of her activities invaded her privacy and caused her severe emotional distress. Plaintiff sought damages for invasion of privacy and both negligent and intentional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases