INDUSTRIAL INDEM. v. PACIFIC MARITIME

TC A8605-02657; CA A48626.

777 P.2d 1385 (1989)

97 Or.App. 676

INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. PACIFIC MARITIME Association, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 26, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. Franklin Hunsaker, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Christopher A. Rycewicz and Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Pendergrass & Hoffman, Portland.

Jeffrey M. Batchelor, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Spears, Lubersky, Bledsoe, Anderson, Young & Hilliard, Portland.

Before GRABER, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.


EDMONDS, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment1 declaring that it had a duty to defend a longshoreman's employment discrimination claim against defendant (PMA). The claim included allegations that the longshoreman (Hill) was intentionally discriminated against because of his race. We reverse.

Plaintiff, whose home office is in California, issued, in California, a standard comprehensive general liability policy to PMA, a California...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases