TEKTRONIX, INC. v. EMPLOYMENT DIV.

88-AB-265, 88-AB-826; CA A48000 (Control), CA A48952.

777 P.2d 1005 (1989)

97 Or.App. 666

TEKTRONIX, INC., Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Irma E. Allen and All Other Claimants Whose Names Appear in Ref. Dec. 87-S-4325-P, Respondents. Tektronix, Inc., Petitioner, v. Employment Division, Nellie Garabato and All Other Claimants Whose Names Appear in Ref. Dec. 88-S-1179-P, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 26, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy Pulvers, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey, Portland.

Linda DeVries Grimms, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


DEITS, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of two Employment Appeals Board orders holding that claimants' receipt of holiday pay did not occur during a "designated vacation period" and, thus, their unemployment compensation benefits should not be reduced by the amount of holiday pay received. We reverse.

Generally, holiday pay is not considered earnings in determining the amount of unemployment benefits payable to a claimant. ORS 657.150(7). However, ORS 657.150...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases