SKELTON v. HANEY

No. 17338.

777 P.2d 733 (1989)

116 Idaho 511

Nancy E. SKELTON and Martha Bonar, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. James HANEY and Janice A. Haley, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants. Elton R. MODROO and Cathy Modroo, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. James HANEY and Janice A. Haley, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

July 31, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon S. Nielson, Boise, argued for defendants-appellants.

Davison, Copple, Copple & Copple, Boise, for plaintiffs-respondents Skelton/Bonar. Scot M. Ludwig argued.

Green & Nyman, Boise, for plaintiffs-respondents Modroos. Kenneth D. Nyman argued.


BAKES, Chief Justice.

This consolidation of two cases involves legal disputes between neighbors concerning easements. The trial court's ruling enjoined defendant appellants James Haney and Janice Haley from interfering with separate easements held by (1) plaintiff respondents Nancy Skelton and Martha Bonar and (2) plaintiff respondents Elton and Cathy Modroo. The trial court also awarded attorney fees and costs (to Skelton/Bonar) and costs and punitive damages (to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases