RESP. DOG OWNERS OF TEX. v. CITY OF RICHARDSON

No. 05-88-01478-CV.

781 S.W.2d 667 (1989)

RESPONSIBLE DOG OWNERS OF TEXAS, David and Carolyn Dailey, Kenneth E. Griffith, Duane Houy, and Mr. and Mrs. Robert E. Hefner, Appellants, v. CITY OF RICHARDSON, Texas, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

Rehearing Denied December 20, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne Brown, Charles W. Yuill, Jr., Dallas, for appellants.

H. Louis Nichols, Dallas, for appellee.

Before ENOCH, C.J., and STEPHENS and BISSETT, JJ.


OPINION

STEPHENS, Justice.

Appellants, hereinafter called Responsible Dog Owners, appeal an adverse summary judgment in favor of the City of Richardson, upholding as valid City of Richardson Ordinance No. 2626-A, adopted by the City Council of the City of Richardson on September 28, 1987, and as amended by Ordinance No. 2654-A, adopted on March 14, 1988, regulating vicious and dangerous animals. Although Responsible Dog Owners present nine points of error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases