In the matter of the Marriage of Charles Carl LEATHERS, Deceased, by AND through His Personal Representative, Charles Carl Leathers, Jr., Appellant-Cross-Respondent, and
Lila Carol Leathers, Respondent-Cross-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted November 18, 1988.
Decided August 30, 1989.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Charles F. Adams, Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs were James R. Cartwright, and Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey, Portland.
Lee Aronson, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With him on the brief were William F. Schulte, Jr., and Schulte, Anderson, DeFranco, Downes & Carter, P.C., Portland.
Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
DEITS, Judge.
In this dissolution proceeding, husband1 appeals the trial court's distribution of marital property, arguing that the court failed to give proper effect to an antenuptial agreement and improperly awarded wife an interest in post-separation profits that he earned. Wife cross-appeals, arguing that the court should have voided the antenuptial agreement altogether. On de novo review, we affirm in part and reverse in part...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.