PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks review of a final order that found that he had violated OAR 291-105-015(A), Rule 1 (disruptive behavior), and imposed sanctions.
First, he contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding of guilty. We disagree.
Petitioner also asserts that the restitution order of $85.33 was "void because no hearing was conducted on the loss, the money was taken in violation of due process of law, [and] the money was taken...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.