1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 107 Wn.2d
  5. 107 Wn.2d 735 (1987)
 

NORDSTROM, INC. v. TAMPOURLOS

No. 52717-2.

107 Wn.2d 735 (1987)

733 P.2d 208

NORDSTROM, INC., Petitioner, v. G. JAMES TAMPOURLOS, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 26, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lane, Powell, Moss & Miller, by John R. Tomlinson and Rudy A. Englund, for petitioner.

Robert J. Hall and William S. Bryan, for respondents.

DORE, J.

We are asked to decide whether a trade name infringement constitutes a Consumer Protection Act violation justifying the award of attorney fees and expenses. We hold that it does, and reverse the Court of Appeals decision denying Nordstrom reasonable attorney fees.

FACTS

The pertinent facts of this case are basically undisputed. Nordstrom and Tampourlos had an agreement for a number of years in which Tampourlos would operate a beauty salon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases