HIGGINS v. MVD

85-0344; CA A37576.

733 P.2d 954 (1987)

84 Or.App. 356

In the matter of the Suspension of the Driving Privileges of George Robert HIGGINS, Petitioner. George Robert Higgins, Appellant, v. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION OF THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 11, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John G. Meyer, Lincoln City, argued the cause and submitted the brief for appellant.

Robert M. Atkinson, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


DEITS, Judge.

Petitioner appeals a judgment affirming an order of the Motor Vehicles Division (MVD) suspending his driving privileges. He argues that the suspension should be set aside, because the circuit court failed to conduct a hearing within the time required by Uniform Trial Court Rule 10.070(1).1 We affirm.

Petitioner was arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicants and refused to take an Intoxilyzer test. His...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases