1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 659 F.Supp.
  5. 659 F.Supp. 1 (1986)
 

HAWKINS v. SCHIRACK

No. C84-2433A.

659 F.Supp. 1 (1986)

Ricardo E. HAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. Robert C. SCHIRACK, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D.

February 4, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Dare Hawkins, Thomas F. Aubry, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs.

Sanders J. Mestel, Schulman, Mestel & Falvey Co., Canton, Ohio, for Schirack.

James R. Unger, Prosecutor's Office, Canton, Ohio, for deft. Board of Com'rs, Stark Co.

Jacob F. Hess, Jr., Amerman, Burt & Jones Co., Canton, Ohio, for Rufo.

Ralph Ross, Canton, Ohio, for Patrick.

Robert W. Blakemore, David A. Lieberth, Blakemore, Rosen, Meeker & Varian Co., Akron, Ohio, for Sponseller.

Mark J. Skakun, Akron, Ohio, David M. Bridenstine, Asst. Pros. Atty., Canton, Ohio, for Watkins.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

By an order filed May 14, 1985, this Court granted the motion of the plaintiff, Ricardo Hawkins, to dismiss with prejudice the amended complaint filed against all defendants. Before the order further was filed, a number of defendants had indicated the belief that they were entitled to an award against the plaintiff for attorney fees and expenses. Consequently, the order of May 14, 1985, granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases