1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 635 F.Supp.
  5. 635 F.Supp. 1336 (1986)
 

AKZO v. E.I. DUPONT de NEMOURS

Civ. A. No. 85-0459-R.

635 F.Supp. 1336 (1986)

AKZO N.V. and Aramide Maatschappij Vof., Plaintiffs, v. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division.

May 23, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Roberts, Gary J. Spahn, Mays, Valentine, Davenport & Moore, Richmond, Va., Dennis McInerney, George Wailand, P. Kevin Castel, Cahill, Gordon & Reindel, New York City, Robert Hardy Falk, Hubbard, Thurman, Turner & Tucker, Dallas, Tex., C. Frederick Leydig, Phillip H. Mayer, Charles S. Oslakovic, Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Robert H. Patterson, Jr., Anne Marie Whittemore, McGuire, Woods & Battle, Richmond, Va., Joseph M. Fitzpatrick, Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, New York City, for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT

RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, District Judge.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

1. Plaintiffs Akzo N.V. ("Akzo") and Aramide Maatschappij Vof. ("Aramide") instituted the present action by a complaint filed May 6, 1985, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division. Plaintiffs' complaint alleges that defendant, E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company ("DuPont"), has deliberately infringed U.S. Patent 4,308...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases