1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 724 P.2d
  5. 724 P.2d 924 (1986)
 

STATE v. DUNNING

C85-03-30821; CA A36715.

724 P.2d 924 (1986)

81 Or. App. 296

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Charles G. DUNNING, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 10, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dave E. Groom, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Des Connall, P.C., Portland.

Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.

YOUNG, Judge.

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for the unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1).1 He makes three challenges to the lawfulness of the search warrant. We affirm.

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to controvert. ORS 133.693.2 The affidavit in support of the search warrant recites that most of the affiant's information came...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases