MBL (USA) CORP. v. DIEKMAN

No. 84-2826.

137 Ill. App.3d 238 (1985)

484 N.E.2d 371

MBL (USA) CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant-Appellee, v. FREDERICK J. DIEKMAN et al., Defendants and Counterplaintiffs-Appellants, (Chemi-Flex, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees).

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (2nd Division).

Rehearing denied October 29, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irwin I. Zatz, Roger G. Fein, Rosemarie J. Guadnolo, and Leonard Saphire-Bernstein, all of Arvey, Hodes, Costello & Burman, of Chicago, for appellants.

Jerrold E. Fink and Nancy E. Sasamoto, both of Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd., of Chicago, for appellee MBL (USA) Corporation.

Arnold M. Flank, Ltd., of Chicago, for other appellees.


Reversed and remanded.

JUSTICE BILANDIC delivered the opinion of the court:

Appellants Frederick J. Diekman, FBN Industries, and Surface Additions, Inc. (hereinafter referred to collectively as Diekman), appeal from an order of the circuit court that dismissed their amended counterclaim with prejudice. The amended counterclaim alleged that appellees MBL (USA) Corp. (hereinafter MBL), Chemi-Flex, Inc., and Ernest Meeder conspired to monopolize the urethane...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases