McMAHON v. ELI LILLY AND CO.

Nos. 84-2721, 84-2896.

774 F.2d 830 (1985)

Mary McMAHON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided October 9, 1985.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied December 13, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Filpi, Stack & Filpi, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Steven C. Parrish, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant-appellee.

Before FLAUM and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges, and WEIGEL, Senior District Judge.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied December 13, 1985.

WEIGEL, Senior District Judge.

In proceedings below, plaintiffs Mary McMahon and her husband Francis sued in their individual capacities and as representatives of their deceased son. They claimed that the Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly"), a pharmaceutical manufacturer, failed to warn adequately of the dangerous propensities of diethylstilbestrol (DES).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases