CITY OF PORTLAND v. GATEWOOD

DA 279144; CA A34366.

708 P.2d 615 (1985)

76 Or.App. 74

CITY OF PORTLAND, Appellant, v. Martin L. GATEWOOD, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided October 30, 1985.

Reconsideration Denied December 20, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Garrett A. Richardson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and RICHARDSON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.


GILLETTE, Presiding Judge.

The City of Portland appeals the dismissal of a charge of indecent exposure against defendant, arguing that the trial court erred in granting defendant's demurrer and holding the City's indecent exposure ordinance to be overbroad. We reverse and remand for trial.

Portland City Code § 14.24.060, which defendant is accused of violating, reads:

"It is unlawful for any person to expose his or her genitalia while in a public...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases