1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 754 F.2d
  5. 754 F.2d 452 (1985)
 

VISHIPCO LINE v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A.

No. 644, Docket 84-7778.

754 F.2d 452 (1985)

VISHIPCO LINE, Ha Nam Cong Ty, Dai Nam Hang Hai C.T., Rang Dong Hang Hai C.T., Mekong Ship Co. Sarl, Vishipco Sarl, Thai Binh C.T., Vn Tau Bien C.T., Van An Hang Hai C.T., Cong Ty U Tau Sao Mai and Nguyen Thi Cham, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided February 4, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur M. Boal, Jr., New York City (Boal, Doti & Larsen, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Andrew J. Connick, New York City (Paul T. Shoemaker, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before FEINBERG, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:

America's military involvement in South Vietnam is more than a decade behind us, but the vestigial effects of the fall of Saigon are still manifest. Today we are called upon to address one of the many commercial disputes produced by that sad experience.

We note that this is the second time this case has reached us on appeal. See Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 660 F.2d 854

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases