STATE v. HUBBARD

TC C81-07-33514, CA A23649, SC 29358.

688 P.2d 1311 (1984)

297 Or. 789

STATE of Oregon, Petitioner On Review, v. Gary Thomas HUBBARD, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 18, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on briefs were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen. and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Phillip M. Margolin, Portland, filed the brief and argued the cause for respondent on review.


CARSON, Justice.

The question presented in this case is whether cross-examination related to the arresting officer's knowledge of internal police department procedures and the potential sanctions against officers who use unnecessary force is relevant to show bias or interest and, if so, whether it was reversible error for the trial judge to exclude the evidence.

FACTS

Defendant was convicted by a jury of and sentenced by the trial court for Escape...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases