1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 669 S.W.2d
  5. 669 S.W.2d 900 (1984)
 

PURVIS v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK

No. 83-184.

669 S.W.2d 900 (1984)

282 Ark. 101

M.B. PURVIS, Appellant, v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, Ar et al., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

June 4, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harkey, Walmsley, Belew & Blankenship, Batesville, for appellant.

Rose Law Firm, Little Rock, for La Quinta.

Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, Little Rock, for Worthen Bank & Trust.

R. Jack Magruder, III, City Atty., and Cearley, Mitchell & Roachell, Little Rock, for amicus curiae Homer B. Moran.

ON REHEARING.

PER CURIAM.

The members of the court, having themselves experienced the difficulties presented by appellate court decisions in which no single opinion expresses the position taken by a majority of the judges, have thought it desirable to issue a supplemental opinion, 282 Ark. 102, 667 S.W.2d 936, covering a few basic questions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases