O'CONNELL v. UNEMPLOYMENT INS. APPEALS BD.

Docket No. AO18306.

149 Cal.App.3d 54 (1983)

196 Cal. Rptr. 505

CAROL O'CONNELL, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD et al., Defendants and Appellants; BOYKIN BERKELEY, INC., Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

November 22, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, John Davidson and Charlton G. Holland, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Appellants.

James O. Barney, Philip Bertenthal and Elizabeth R. Arnold for Plaintiff and Respondent.

No appearance for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.


OPINION

LOW, P.J.

We hold that absent a statutory notice by an employer, the presumption that a discharged employee is qualified for unemployment benefits controls the burden of proof at each of the four possible fact-finding levels of review.

Defendants California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board et al., appeal from that part of the judgment of the Contra Costa County Superior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases