GRIFFIN v. GOULD

No. 81-320.

104 Ill. App.3d 397 (1982)

432 N.E.2d 1031

DOROTHY GRIFFIN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HAROLD GOULD et al., Defendants. — (HAROLD GOULD, Defendant-Appellant; APRIL ISAACSON CAMP, Defendant-Appellee.)

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (5th Division).

Opinion filed February 5, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel H. Young, P.C., of Skokie (Samuel H. Young, of counsel), for appellant.

Reinwald & Sostrin, of Chicago (Lester Reinwald and Morris Sostrin, of counsel), for appellees.


Reversed and remanded.

PRESIDING JUSTICE SULLIVAN delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant Harold Gould (defendant) appeals a finding that certain statues passed under the residuary clause of a will. He contends that the trial court erred (1) in holding that article one of the will, disposing of "house furniture and furnishings and articles of household or personal use or ornament of all kinds" was unambiguous...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases