1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 646 P.2d
  5. 646 P.2d 676 (1982)
 

HANNEMAN v. JONES

No. 24643; CA A20202.

646 P.2d 676 (1982)

58 Or.App. 10

Craig HANNEMAN and Kathleen Hanneman, Respondents, v. J. Christopher JONES and Mary Lou Jones, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 23, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Lipscomb, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Ronald P. MacDonald and Blair, MacDonald, Jensen & Lipscomb, Salem.

Stephen S. Walters, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Charles F. Adams and John M. Volkman, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and WARREN, J.

JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

This case was previously before the court on defendants' appeal from an order granting plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. The appeal was dismissed and the case remanded, because the former trial court proceeding had not ended with an appealable final judgment. Nonetheless, in the former opinion, Hanneman v. Jones, 45 Or.App. 1005, 1010-12, 609 P.2d 912 (1980)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases