1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 660 F.2d
  5. 660 F.2d 854 (1981)
 

VISHIPCO LINE v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N. A.

No. 1015, Docket 81-7052.

660 F.2d 854 (1981)

VISHIPCO LINE, Ha Nam Cong Ty, Dai Nam Hang Hai C.T., Rang Dong Hang Hai C.T., Mekong Ship Co. Sarl, Vishipco Sarl, Thai Binh C.T., VN Tau Bien C.T., Van An Hang Hai C.T., Cong Ty U Tau Sao Mai and Nguyen Thi Cham, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided September 29, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur M. Boal, New York City (Arthur M. Boal, Jr., Boal, Doti & Larsen, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Andrew J. Connick, New York City (Toni C. Lichstein, Paul T. Shoemaker, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, MANSFIELD and VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judges.

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered after a non-jury trial by Judge Robert L. Carter on December 5, 1980, dismissing their claims against Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), for breach of contract. The ten corporate plaintiffs — Vishipco Line, Ha Nam Cong Ty, Dai Nam Hang Hai C.T., Rang Dong Hang Hai C.T., Mekong Ship Co. Sarl, Vishipco Sarl, Thai Binh...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases