FOTH, C.J.:
The issue in this case is whether an animal constitutes "traffic" subject to police regulation. If so, the owner of the animal in this case was guilty of refusing to comply with the lawful order of an officer directing traffic, in violation of K.S.A. 8-1503, and was properly fined $25.00. If an animal is not traffic, and the statute deals only with vehicular traffic, then the defendant owner is not guilty and must prevail in his appeal.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.