STATE v. MEPHAM

No. 10-79-05952; CA 15309; No. 10-79-05953; CA 15310.

613 P.2d 500 (1980)

46 Or.App. 839

STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Charles Henry MEPHAM, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 30, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., and Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen., Salem.

H. Thomas Evans, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Evans & Armstrong, Eugene.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and JOSEPH, WARDEN and WARREN, JJ.


WARDEN, Judge.

The state appeals from an order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a warrant. In a suppression hearing involving a charge of possession of marijuana, the trial court had ruled the affidavit insufficient to support the issuance of a warrant. An additional charge, tampering with drug records, presented the same issues of fact and law. The two cases, therefore, were consolidated on appeal.

The affidavit is set out below.1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases