WIXOM v. INGHAM

No. 1 CA-CIV 1883.

21 Ariz. App. 65 (1973)

515 P.2d 606

Florence S. WIXOM, Appellant, v. Howard R. INGHAM and Rose S. Ingham, Husband and wife, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Rehearing Denied December 5, 1973.

Review Denied January 15, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burch, Cracchiolo, Levie, Guyer & Weyl by Joseph L. Moore, Phoenix, for appellant.

Preston, Flournoy & Flick by William R. Preston, Flagstaff, for appellees.


OPINION

JACOBSON, Chief Judge.

This appeal from a judgment of foreclosure of a $60,000 note and mortgage raises the issue of whether the recording of a mortgage constitutes a valid delivery and whether the evidence sustains the trial court's determination that the defendant owed plaintiffs $60,000.

Before setting out the facts in this case, the court notes that the evidence presented in this matter is diametrically opposed on both sides. The facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases