1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Commw.
  4. 8 Pa.Commw.
  5. 8 Pa.Commw. 468 (1973)
 

PITTSBURGH et al. v. HOUSTON et al.

Appeal, No. 635 C.D. 1972.

8 Pa.Commw. 468 (1973)

Pittsburgh, et al. v. Houston, et al.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

April 19, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William McC. Houston, with him Houston, Houston & Donnelly, for appellants.

Grace S. Harris, Special Assistant City Solicitor, with her Ralph Lynch, Jr., City Solicitor, for appellees.

Argued March 6, 1973, before President Judge BOWMAN, and Judges CRUMLISH, JR., KRAMER, WILKINSON, JR., MENCER, ROGERS and BLATT.

OPINION BY JUDGE WILKINSON, April 19, 1973:

It is entirely appropriate that we should introduce this opinion with the introduction used by Justice POMEROY in his able opinion when this taxing ordinance was attacked in F.J. Busse Company, et al. v. Pittsburgh, 443 Pa. 349, 352, 279 A.2d 14, 15 (1971).

"The City of Pittsburgh, as a municipal corporation and a city of the second class, acting under the authority of the Local...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases