STATE v. PITTMAN


124 N.J. Super. 334 (1973)

306 A.2d 500

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. NATHANIEL PITTMAN AND MIRIAM PITTMAN, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Criminal).

Decided June 8, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert M. Holland, attorney for defendant Nathaniel Pittman.

Mr. Bruce Edington, attorney for defendant Miriam Pittman.

Mr. Joseph Regan, Assistant Prosecutor, argued for the State (Mr. James M. Coleman, Jr., Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney).


McGOWAN, A.J.S.C.

Codefendants seek an order dismissing count I of an indictment charging them with conspiracy to make false statements to procure the issuance of credit cards, contrary to N.J.S.A. 2A:98-1, "Conspiracy."

The ground urged by both defendants is that at the time of the commission of the alleged offense, and presently, they were and are husband and wife, and because of this it is urged that they cannot be charged with conspiracy because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases