NEW YORK MERCHANDISE, INC., Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Appellee.
United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 25, 1972.
May 25, 1972.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Stein & Shostak, Los Angeles, Cal., attorneys of record, for appellant; Leonard M. Fertman, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel.
L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Andrew P. Vance, Chief, Customs Section, Susan C. Cassell, New York City, for the United States.
Before RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN, and LANE, Judges, and RE, Judge, United States Customs Court, sitting by designation.
United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.
RE, Judge.
The question presented on this appeal is whether the Customs Court1 erred in overruling the importer's protest to the classification of certain merchandise under item 544.51 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as "Mirrors * * * Not over 1 sq. ft. in reflecting area" dutiable at 33% ad valorem. Appellant contends that the merchandise should properly be classified under item 544.54, TSUS, as "Mirrors * * * Over 1 sq...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.