MANN v. PHILIP VIZZINI & SON, INC.

[No. 65, September Term, 1971.]

263 Md. 471 (1971)

283 A.2d 577

MANN AND OSBORNE T/A HARFORD SOD COMPANY v. PHILIP VIZZINI & SON, INC.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 15, 1971.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Garmer for appellants.

W. Hamilton Whiteford for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, FINAN, SINGLEY, and DIGGES, JJ.


BARNES, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The questions presented to us in this case are whether the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Cardin, J.) erred (1) in finding that the appellants, Earl R. Mann and Winton B. Osborne, trading as Harford Sod Company (Harford Sod), did not establish that the rejection of a portion of the work of Harford Sod as subcontractor under a contract dated September 6, 1961, with the appellee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases