4 Div. 501.

162 So.2d 894 (1964)


Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. H. Baldwin, Andalusia, for appellant.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Paul T. Gish, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

CATES, Judge.

Edwards was convicted of possessing prohibited liquors and sentenced as a multiple offender to twelve months hard labor. This lengthier term comes from Code 1940, T. 29, § 99, for a third or subsequent conviction.

February 16, 1963, officers armed with a search warrant issued on an affidavit based on probable cause found moonshine whiskey in Edwards's home. No time of execution appears on the return to the warrant.

The evidence of the time of search is as follows:

"Q What time of the day did you enter that home? "A It was late afternoon. "Q Was it before 6 o'clock, P.M.? "A Well, I really couldn't say about that. "Q What is your opinion as to what time you went there? "A It was about good dark. "MR. BALDWIN: May I inquire along this line, if the Court pleases? "THE COURT: Has anybody told you about a night time search warrant? "A Yes, sir. "Q Was it dark? We'll put it that way. "A It was dark, yes, sir. "MR. BALDWIN: We object to the introduction of the proposed exhibit, being a purported affidavit for a search warrant, a search warrant being issued by Comer Mahone, Justice of the Peace, on the 16th day of February, 1963, on the following grounds: It appears that the search was made at a time not in the day time; the search warrant does not authorize a night time search. On the further grounds that the warrant was not executed in the manner prescribed by law, in that the results of the search do not appear on the return attached to the warrant. "THE COURT: Overrule. "MR. BALDWIN: We reserve an exception."

The facts being uncontroverted, no motion to suppress before trial was mandatory. Lawson v. State, 42 Ala.App. 172, 157 So.2d 226; Brown v. State, Ala.App., ___ So.2d ___ (Ms., 7 Div. 739).

The State failed to show the search was made within the legal hours. Under Weldon v. State, 39 Ala.App. 286, 97 So.2d 825, this judgment is due to be reversed.

Reversed and remanded.


1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases