BOYD v. STATE

6 Div. 40.

158 So.2d 115 (1963)

Earnest BOYD v. STATE of Alabama.

Supreme Court of Alabama.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Corretti & Newsom, Birmingham, and Hawkins, Rhea & Wright, Gadsden, for petitioner.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and Maurice F. Bishop, Birmingham, opposed.


GOODWYN, Justice.

Petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals.

We have no alternative but to strike the petition because it is not on transcript paper. Supreme Court Rule 32, Revised Rules of the Supreme Court, 261 Ala. XIX, XXXI, Code 1940, Tit. 7, 1955 Cumulative Pocket Part, p. 233, Recompiled Code 1958, Tit. 7, Appendix, p. 1172; Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 274 Ala. 613, 149 So.2d 923; Smith v. Smith, 273 Ala. 230 139 So.2d 346; Ex parte Davis, 269 Ala. 58, 110 So.2d 306; Accardo v. State, 268 Ala. 293, 105 So.2d 865; McDonald v. Amason, 267 Ala. 654, 104 So.2d 719; Ladd v. State, 266 Ala. 586, 98 So.2d 59; Smith v. State, 264 Ala. 264, 86 So.2d 842; Duckett v. State, 257 Ala. 589, 60 So.2d 357; Stovall v. State, 257 Ala. 124, 57 So.2d 642.

Petition stricken.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and MERRILL and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases