1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 324 F.2d
  5. 324 F.2d 772 (1963)
 

LILE v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

No. 18206.

324 F.2d 772 (1963)

Trennis K. LILE, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

November 20, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fizzolio & Fizzolio and Albert Vieri, North Hollywood, Cal., for petitioner.

Philip A. Loomis, Jr., Gen. Counsel, Walter P. North, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Jacob H. Stillman, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.

MATHES, District Judge.

Respondent moves at the outset to dismiss the petition for review as tardily filed. Section 25(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provides that: "Any person aggrieved by an order issued by the Commission * * * may obtain a review of such order in the United States Court of Appeals * * * by filing in such court, within sixty days after the entry of such order, a written petition praying that the order of the Commission be modified or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases