3 Div. 113.

140 So.2d 294 (1962)


Court of Appeals of Alabama.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Ruffin, pro se.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., Bernard F. Sykes, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Roy E. Hicks, Montgomery, Legal Research Aide, for the State.

HARWOOD, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered by the Hon. Eugene Carter, a judge of the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, denying appellant's release in a habeas corpus proceeding.

The appellant is now a convict serving a sentence imposed upon him upon his conviction in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, under an indictment charging him with escaping from confinement.

In his answer in the habeas corpus proceedings below, the respondent Martin J. Wiman, Warden of Kilby prison, asserted that he was holding this appellant under and by virtue of the above mentioned judgments of the Jefferson County Circuit Court. A copy of the indictment in the case, and of the judgment entered therein, is attached to the respondent's answer as an exhibit to his return to the writ.

The Circuit Court of Jefferson County has jurisdiction to render the judgment and to pronounce the sentence, and the indictment and judgment appear regular in all respects. As stated by Price, J., in Argo v. State (Ala.App.), 133 So.2d 201:

"It is well settled that when a judgment or sentence of another court is returned as the cause of the petitioner's detention or imprisonment, the jurisdiction of the court to render such judgment or sentence is the only matter which may be considered. Ex parte Bizzell, 112 Ala. 210, 21 So. 371; Mackreth v. Wilson, supra [31 Ala.App. 191, 15 So.2d 112]; Howard v. City of Bessemer, 40 Ala.App. 317, 114 So.2d 158. In order to impeach the trial court's jurisdiction on habeas corpus, illegality must appear on the face of the proceedings. Griffin v. State, 258 Ala. 557, 63 So.2d 682."

This judgment is due to be affirmed and it is so ordered.



1000 Characters Remaining reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases