SPANO v. NEW YORK

No. 582.

360 U.S. 315 (1959)

SPANO v. NEW YORK.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1959.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert S. Siegal argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Rita D. Schechter.

Irving Anolik argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Daniel V. Sullivan and Walter E. Dillon.


MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is another in the long line of cases presenting the question whether a confession was properly admitted into evidence under the Fourteenth Amendment. As in all such cases, we are forced to resolve a conflict between two fundamental interests of society; its interest in prompt and efficient law enforcement, and its interest in preventing the rights of its individual members from being abridged by unconstitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases