O'CONNELL v. ZIMMERMAN

Docket No. 9318.

157 Cal.App.2d 330 (1958)

321 P.2d 161

DANIEL E. O'CONNELL, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FRANK ZIMMERMAN et al., Appellants; CHARLES S. MOORE, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

January 31, 1958.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gilbert Moody and A.M. Frad for Appellants.

Daniel E. O'Connell, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Respondent.

John A. Swenson for Defendant and Respondent.


WARNE, J., pro tem.*

This is an appeal by Frank and Bertha Zimmerman from a judgment in favor of the respondent, Charles S. Moore, for specific performance, allowing Moore damages for wrongful withholding of real property and for certain rentals and also allowing the respondent, Daniel E. O'Connell, costs incurred as escrow attorney and an attorney fee.

The appellants, Frank and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases