1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 139 Cal.App.2d
  5. 139 Cal.App.2d 659 (1956)
 

O'DEA v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

Docket No. 16566.

139 Cal.App.2d 659 (1956)

294 P.2d 171

JACK O'DEA et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

March 2, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fahey, Castagnetto & Gallen for Appellants.

Keith C. Sorenson, District Attorney, and James M. Parmelee, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

DEVINE, J. pro tem.*

Plaintiffs husband and wife have appealed a judgment which denied them recovery of damages for an asserted trespass on their property. Their complaint alleged trespass and nuisance, but their claim against the county of San Mateo, they say, is essentially one of inverse eminent domain. They contend that their land was "taken," in that it was used, by the county without compensation having been made as required by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases